Fifteen years ago, we were still comfortably in the era where enterprise software was expected to carry you for years, if not a decade plus. Yes, Agile was around, but major decisions (about CRMs, ERPs, etc.) took time. Ditto implementations and training.
That’s changing.
Today, the pace of technology development means the half-life of a good purchase decision is miniscule. Yes, that software you just demoed may meet your exact needs today, but what happens when a new regulation hits? What about when buyers start embracing screenless interfaces? Or when an LLM update brings new functionality into the mix?
In our current environment, tech buyers need a new skill: just-in-time decision making. They need to be able to assess a constantly shifting reality, learn fast, and make high-stakes decisions confidently. And then do it all again tomorrow. For many of us, that’s a big shift.
Luckily, you’ve probably already started to adjust. In this piece, I’ll offer some context around why this is our new normal and some tips for adapting faster and thriving in the era of just-in-time decision making.
You can get fired for buying IBM, actually
It used to be that going with the biggest name in the industry was a safe choice. Nobody would blame you for choosing IBM or Salesforce or SAP.
Maybe the software was expensive, maybe the contract terms were not ideal, but most organizations didn’t have an alternative. The products were effective. They delivered essential functionality. For a long time, the pain of switching to something else—never mind the pain of trying to build an alternative—was far greater than the pain of paying.
Increasingly, though, that’s changing.
Every few weeks, there's a headline about an executive who canceled a major software subscription to build an in-house alternative. As a spokesperson from one such company said, “AI changes the economics of building software.”
Note that this doesn’t mean anyone can just spin up an effective alternative to Salesforce. Compliance and security and privacy and interoperability are still important. Building and maintaining software to deliver the functionality you need while also meeting legal and contractual obligations isn’t easy.
What's shifted in the last few years is that, thanks to the way AI has changed the economics of building software, buying IBM is no longer the safe choice it once was. There's now a much stronger case to be made for a newer, leaner alternative. Or a homegrown product that’s built for exactly the use cases you need.
Just as important: the rate of change of available technology is increasing. As tech buyers consider a system of record, they no longer have the luxury of gathering requirements for several months, then considering solutions, then starting a three-year development or onboarding process.
Today, technical capabilities might evolve significantly in the time it used to take to gather requirements. If you’re following the old model, you’ll almost certainly invest in technology that meets the needs of your organization at some date in the past.
What this means for today’s tech buyers is that the skill set needed to make effective technology purchases has changed.